AAOIFI Shari'ah Standard No. 36

Impact of Contingent Incidents on Commitments — practice questions

العوارض الطارئة على الالتزامات

16 questions in the bankMultiple choice

Sample questions from the AAOIFI Test question bank on Shari'ah Standard No. 36. Pick an answer to check it and read the explanation.

Sample questions

Question 1 of 3

Under Shari’ah Standard No. (36), how is a contingent incident distinguished from a defect of will?

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Clauses 1 and 2: Contingent incidents are incidents that occur suddenly and significantly affect commitments that were properly stipulated. They differ from defects of will, which exist from the time of signing even though their impact appears later, and from termination of commitments by mutual consent or by a party exercising a contractual right. The Standard does not cover defects of will or conduct resulting from mutual consent.

Question 2 of 3

Which of the following is an example of a contingency that leads to amendment of the contract rather than its termination?

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Clauses 3 and 4: Contingent incidents either necessitate amendment of the contract or constitute an external reason for its termination. Examples of the former include the levy of customs duties or taxes after signing (affecting the party who must bear them by law or contract), price changes causing serious harm, prevention of importation of goods due under Murabahah or Ijarah, and changes in law increasing one party’s obligations. Impossibility, destruction and third-party entitlement fall under Clause 5.

Question 3 of 3

A contractor under an Istisna’a contract faces a sudden, severe surge in steel prices after signing, which would cause him serious harm if he performed at the agreed price. How does the Standard address this?

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Clause 4/2: A change in the prices of commodities used in implementing a contract, in a way that subjects the contractor to serious harm, is a contingency leading to amendment rather than termination; the actual harm can be removed through reconciliation, arbitration or legal arrangements. This is consistent with Clause 4/2/1 of Shari’ah Standard No. (11), which permits amendment of the Istisna’a price for force majeure by agreement, arbitration or the judiciary.

Practise all 16 questions on Standard 36

Plus a timed mock exam, a smart mistakes bank and 1,278 questions across 59 AAOIFI Shari'ah standards.

Start practisingAbout AAOIFI Test →